The Cost of Manual Transmission vs. Automatic Transmission: Is it Worth it?

Once upon a time, manual transmission vehicles were much more fuel efficient than their automatic transmission brethren. Buying a manual over an automatic often lead to significant cost savings, and there were enough of them being sold and driven that selling and re-sale value were not a problem.

Fast forward to today, and manual transmission vehicles are going virtually extinct. I’ll take a look at the fuel efficiency, MSRP savings, and replacement costs of manual transmission vehicles compared to automatic to determine whether or not buying a manual is still worth it or whether its best to let the stick go the way of the dodo.

automatic vs manual transmission

Manual Transmission Fuel Savings (in the 80’s) documents the EPA fuel efficiency comparisons from every make and model going back to 1984. So, I decided to turn back the clock to see what kind of fuel efficiency a manual transmission vehicle back then had over an automatic. I decided to select the 1984 Ford Escort (my dad had a model pretty close to this one at one point). I’ll use today’s gas prices to make the comparison (once you figure in inflation, savings comparisons should be fairly equal):

1984 Ford Escort, 1.6L, Manual, 4-Speed:

  • 28 mpg city, 39 mpg highway
  • Annual fuel cost @ $3.47 per gallon and 15,000 miles driven = $1,650

1984 Ford Escort, 1.6L, Auto, 3-Speed:

  • 21 mpg city, 26 mpg highway
  • Annual fuel cost @ $3.47 per gallon and 15,000 miles driven = $2,250

Wow, that’s pretty significant. Back in 1984, buying a manual transmission Escort resulted in an annual fuel savings of $600 over an automatic (at today’s gas prices). If you figure you’ll be driving that vehicle for 8 years, you’re looking at a total savings of $4,800. OK, so I can see why manual transmissions were seen as a cost saver.

But do they still deserve that reputation?

Let’s fast forward to today.

Manual vs. Automatic Transmission Fuel Savings (Updated for 2024)

The Ford Escort no longer exists (RIP), but I found what would be a close comparison, the 1.5L Honda Civic. Let’s take a look at the manual versus automatic transmission performance in 2024:

2024 Honda Civic, 1.5L, Manual Transmission, 6-Speed Turbo:

  • 28 mpg city, 37 mpg highway, 31 mpg combined
  • Annual fuel cost @ $3.47 per gallon and 15,000 miles driven = $1,700

2024 Honda Civic, 1.5L, Automatic Transmission, Variable Gear Turbo:

  • 33 mpg city, 42 mpg highway, 36 mpg combined
  • Annual fuel cost @ $3.47 per gallon and 15,000 miles driven = $1,450

A $250 annual cost savings for the automatic transmission? Wait, how could that be? The 2024 automatic transmission Civic actually gets BETTER fuel efficiency than the manual transmission version?!

Don’t be surprised. This is the state of automotive transmissions today. Automatic models are usually as efficient as manuals these days, across the board, particularly with continuously variable gears. The most fuel-efficient cars are electric these days, but with automatic vs manual transmission gas combustion engines, the automatic versions of vehicles are almost always more efficient than the manual transmission versions. And that’s considering the driver actually knows how to freaking drive a manual (hasn’t been the case with 75% of the drivers I’ve had the “privilege” of being a passenger with).

Fuel efficiency is no longer a reason to buy a manual transmission vehicle in the modern era.

Manual Transmission MSRP Savings Vs. Automatic

In my cheapest new cars post, I only highlighted the prices of the automatic vehicles, despite the manual versions actually being cheaper. I’ll explain why I did that (other than comparing apples to apples).

First, just because you’re buying a manual vehicle at a lower price than an automatic does not mean that you’re necessarily coming out ahead. When you go to sell that vehicle, you’re not going to be able to sell it for the same amount as an automatic.

How much will you save buying a new manual transmission vehicle versus an automatic transmission? It’s pretty typical to see about a $1,000 difference between the two (in favor of the manual transmission). In the Honda Civic example I gave, the automatic transmission would make up that cost in 4 years with fuel savings.

There are a lot of factors that go into how much you could re-sell these vehicles for down the road, but 9 times out of 10 you’re going to be able to demand a higher price with the automatic. It may not be the full original difference between the two models, but it will probably be close.

Another factor you should consider is how few people out there are actually looking to buy a manual transmission these days. Just 1.7% of vehicles sold in the U.S. market are manual transmission.

Why is that important? Well, when you go to sell your vehicle, you might have trouble if 98% of re-sale market buyers want nothing to do with it. Your vehicle won’t be able to command as much money or as much attention as an automatic and will take much longer to sell (if at all). Sure, certain very expensive sporty cars might be an exception to this rule, but for most makes and models, this rule will hold true.

Cost of Replacing a Manual Transmission

I alluded to many manual transmission drivers not really knowing how to effectively drive a stick. Each time they accelerate and shift late or early, or decelerate and do the same, they are slowly killing their transmission.

If they aren’t able to sell their vehicle before the transmission goes, look out! The cost of replacing a transmission varies widely, but expect to pay between $1,000 to $6,000 for a rebuild. Automatic transmission go bad much less frequently than manuals… mostly because the machine is much more efficient at changing gears than a human. Suddenly, that $1,000 MSRP cost savings does not seem so appealing, does it?

Manual Transmission vs. Automatic Transmission: Other Factors

Let’s not forget the convenience factor of automatic transmission vehicles. Manual die-hards will tell you that driving a stick has become second nature. They don’t even think about it. That may be, but I prefer to have an extra hand, even if it’s to do things I shouldn’t be doing that take my focus off the road.

They’ll also argue it’s “more fun”. I would agree that you’re more engaged or more “in-tune” with a stick. But more fun? I’ll pass on that kind of fun.

And they’ll say it’s “faster” because they can time the shifting better than an automatic. That’s doubtful, but even if it was true, drag-racing is out of style these days.

Save your money and the hassle. It’s time to put the nail in the coffin of the stick.

Manual Transmission Discussion:

  • Have you ever owned a stick? Why?
  • In retrospect did you actually save money over an automatic?
  • Are you a stick die-hard? Convince us automatic trans drivers why we should consider a stick.

Related Posts:


  1. Katy
    • dustin
      • Greg
    • Gregory Powers
  2. Trevor
      • Marc T
        • Gregory B Powers
  3. Brandy
    • rye
  4. R S
    • Michael
  5. SaraH
    • Michael
  6. KM
      • Michael
      • zx
      • jmills)__
      • Chris
  7. AJ
      • Michael
      • nate
        • David
      • jade
    • Peter
      • Olivia
        • Peter
    • Mark
    • CJ
    • Chris
      • Chris A
      • Peter
  8. Michael
    • Michael
    • Pat
      • Garrett
        • gimi
        • Chris A
    • rye
    • Jennifer
  9. Ryan
  10. thomas
  11. 50plusfinance
    • jade
  12. KM
  13. KM
  14. Linda M.
  15. Michael
  16. Southy
  17. tom
  18. Sone
    • Chris A
  19. juno
  20. Big E
  21. wade
    • Henry
  22. Peter
    • Randy
  23. Nick
  24. Peter
  25. Jed
    • Andrew Orr
  26. Andrew Orr
  27. Andrew Orr
  28. Charles
  29. Javier
  30. Lisa
  31. LK
  32. nick
  33. German Girl
    • Sandeep
    • dawna
  34. Anonymous
  35. Vico
    • Henry
  36. Arthur
  37. RED
  38. JZD
  39. New to Manual
    • red
  40. Arden Baino
    • Ken
  41. Zack
    • Hoss
      • Chris
  42. Ty
  43. Henry
  44. FranksonofJoe
    • Peter
  45. Lalaine
  46. Randy
  47. Melody
  48. Hoss
  49. Jareth
    • Chris
      • Jennifer
  50. Poqui
    • slushbox
  51. Ian
  52. F. R. E.
    • Shane
      • Chris
      • FRE
      • Peter
      • Peter
  53. Jennifer
    • F. R. E.
      • Jennifer
        • Chris
          • Jennifer
  54. Chris
    • F. R. E.
      • Chris
        • F. R. E.
    • Chris
  55. Eroch
    • Peter
    • FRE
  56. F. R. E.
  57. Thescorpio
  58. Mark
  59. Wu
    • FRE
  60. Peter
    • FRE
  61. Warren L Gaiennie Jr
  62. J Payne
  63. k
  64. Neil
  65. F. R. E.
  66. F. R. E.
  67. litesong
  68. john jager
  69. Aaron
    • Greg
      • Mel J.
  70. chevrolet
  71. Antonio
  72. Mel J.
  73. Greg James
  74. Kelly
  75. Gregory B. Powers
  76. afafdasdf
  77. Greg
  78. Jared
  79. Jubei
  80. Gregory B Powers
  81. Don't care for PRNDL
  82. Ken Thompson
  83. Sam
  84. Cher

Leave a Reply